Suppose a manufacturer wants to designate one of its employees to provide expert testimony about the design process in a products liability case. Perhaps a bank wants one of its loan officers to give an expert opinion on lending practices. There can be many benefits to using a qualified expert who is already in-house, including that the employee-expert may be more familiar with the subject-matter of the litigation than a retained expert and is already on the payroll, eliminating the need to pay costly hourly fees. But can the company’s trial counsel help an employee-expert prepare for his or her testimony in the same way that they would for any other expert witness? Or will doing so risk waiving the attorney-client privilege? In federal court, the current discovery rules expressly allow for the withholding of expert materials “otherwise discoverable” on the basis of privilege. In Texas state courts, the answer was less clear until last month’s decision in the case of In re City of Dickinson.
Posted by Andrew “Drew” Robertson
With a reputation for determination and an impeccable eye for detail, Andrew “Drew” Robertson lends his ample legal knowledge and abilities to KRCL’s litigation team. He handles complex commercial matters for clients in a variety of industries, including financial services, commercial real estate, and healthcare. Drew’s practice focuses on Texas...
- Snowman, What’s Your 20? – Loaded Up and Trucking in the New Age of the Electronic Logging Device.
- Truck Drivers Required to Use Electronic Logging Devices Begin December 18, 2017
- Newly Nominated FMCSA Chief to Face Changing Regulatory Environment
- Trump Administration Seeks Looser Truck Safety Regulations